|
Abstract
The turn to the use of mixed qualitative and quantitative
(Q-Squared) methods in the analysis of poverty is a
welcome development with large potential payoffs. While
the benefits of mixing are not in doubt, the tensions
involved in so doing have not received adequate attention.
The aim of this paper is to address this gap in the
“Q-Squared” literature. It argues that there
are important differences between approaches to poverty
which operate at the levels of epistemology and normative
theory. These differences have implications for the
numerical transformation of data, the selection of validity
criteria, the conception/dimension of poverty adopted
and interpersonal comparisons of well-being.
|